With ANYTHING other but Protools below 12. ![]() I can totally understand this would be a great thing with the C24 as a controller. ![]() And since the Mixbus community is widely a "non-nonsense" type of guys i expect there will be a lot of useful stuff be shared in the form of scripts for everyday tasks. According to Harrison, the scripting engine will have such powerful interface to Mixbus functionality that it would even be possibility to write your own MIDI processors, think of custom MiDI-plugin functionality. And i really need such functions like "spread the different midi channels of track x into seperate tracks starting from Track y but leave out channels without content" or you can guess how interesting and effective individual export-scripts would be, if you need some custom works to be done to each exported track and many other useful possibilities. In Sonar there is such a scripting language, that is not documented anyhow, except with "example scripts" and some old external webpage. This is one of the most useful things i oftenly miss in DAWs or it is there, but undocumented or handled like a "legacy" thing nobody needs. I guess this makes wide parts of Mixbus automatable in a virtuelly near unlimited manner with a widely used standard scripting language that is quite versatile. They implemented a Lua-based scripting engine. The version 4 in march will have a new feature that i am really looking forward to. The idea of the character EQs seems very useful to me, quite an intelligent idea.Īnd a last one that might be important for editing tasks in Mixbus. Right now, i have the Essentials bundle (Verb and Echo), the Mastering EQ, the Spectral Compressor, the De-Esser, my next purchase will most probably be the character bundle. What i do in the meantime, is, that i purchased some of Harrisons own LV2 plugins, and up to now, i was not disappointed with any of them. I can say nothing about Waves, Slate and iLok based plugins. Some other VST2 64bit plugins, like Klanghelm stuff. I use AD2 and Jamstix for drum bus stuff, Mixbus sounds great for creating drum tracks. I did not check it, but i think VST3 is also not implemented right now, but don't nail me on this.įact is - i rarely use 3rd party plugins in the meantime. And the Sonar VST implementation is quite good.Īs for plugins - Harrison will not build a bitbridge, they only support 64bit plugins. In the meantime, i also have found a plugin, that made problems in Sonar, but works flawlessly in Mixbus. Often, because the plugins have a problem or don't work fully up the the interfaces specs. But some people ascribe a huge difference to dither so yes, the sound of the mixers will be fundamentally different to a discriminating user.AFAIK Harrison does implement the interfaces to exact specification, so, it is possible that NOT all plugins load flawlessly. In practice, if the EQs are both set flat or bypassed, the difference should be vanishingly small: similar to the magnitude of dither. meaning the signal is always passing through the math, ( bypass simply means that the gain for the EQs is set to "0" ). In both products, the channelstrip EQ is "always in circuit". The sound of Mixbus and Mixbus32C are largely identical. This provides more grouping and effects buses, and allows you to manage a larger mix than the regular Mixbus. Mixbus32C provides 12 stereo mix-buses, with send-level knobs on every channel strip. In addition, each bus send can be "panned" separately from the master bus pan location.We expect this to meet the needs of users who are mixing 8-24 channels. Mixbus provides 8 stereo mix-buses, with send-levels on every channel strip.But feature-wise and sound-wise, it meets nearly any need for equalization you would rarely if ever need to add an additional EQ. The 32C EQ requires a larger monitor, to fit all the controls on-screen. The Mixbus32C EQ is a recreation of our analog 32-Series EQ, which has 4 bands ( the top bands can be switched from shelving to peaking ), and both high- and low- pass filters.There are a few cases where you might need to add a plugin EQ, to solve a specific need. 90% of EQ jobs can be handled with a 3band sweepable eq, and a high-pass filter. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |